Post Flight Report 飞行后报告
In this lesson you will collect and analyze qualitative data pertaining to how your glider flew after you made changes to the original design. Based on this data you will then need to determine if your plane flew better or worse, and why. It is also important to remember that disproving your hypothesis is perfectly valid. Never change your original predictions or data because you want your experiment to support your hypothesis.
在这节课中，你将收集和分析与滑翔机在更改原始设计后如何飞行有关的定性数据。根据这些数据，需要确定飞机是飞得更好还是更糟，以及原因。记住，反驳你的假设是完全有效的。务必不要改变原始预测或数据，因为你想让你的实验支持你的假设。
Review & Summary 回顾与总结:
- Describe how your original airplane flew before you made changes to the design.
在你改动设计之前，描述一下你原来的飞机是如何飞行（或坠毁的）。 - Describe what changes you made to your airplane to address the problems described in “Question 1”.
描述你对你的飞机做了什么改变来解决你刚才在“问题1”中描述的问题。 - Describe how you airplane flew after you made changes to the design of your airplane.
描述一下你改变了飞机的设计之后，你的飞机是如何飞行的。 - How were your test flights similar, or how were they dissimilar?
试飞有什么相似/不同之处？ - Did your new airplane design fly better or worse than the original airplane design?
你的新飞机设计比原来的飞机设计飞更好或更差吗？
CER Statement CER声明:
Claim 声明:
Did your re-designed airplane fly better or worse than the original airplane design? Please see your answer to “question 5”.
你重新设计的飞机是否比原来的飞机飞得更好或更差？请参考“问题5”的回答。
Evidence 证据:
State the relevant evidence / observations from your test flights (i.e. the observations from both original design and redesigned airplane test flights) that would support your claim.
陈述你的试飞中的相关证据/观察（即原始设计和重新设计的飞机试飞中的观察）以支持你的声明。
Reasoning 推理:
State how the evidence supports your claim. Don’t just simply restate your evidence but explain why / how it supports your claim (i.e. how did the changes to the airplane design improve / impair the airplanes ability to fly).
陈述证据如何支持你的声明。不要简单地重申你的证据，而是解释为什么/是如何支持你的声明（即飞机设计的改变是如何改善/削弱飞机的飞行能力的）